|
musicavant
/
¼Ò°³ ¹× »ç¿ë¾È³»
/
¿¬½À½Ç
/
°íÀüÀ½¾Ç ¹× ±¹¾Ç ¸ðÀ½
/
´ëÁßÀ½¾Ç ¹× µ¿½Ã´ëÀ½¾Ç ¸ðÀ½
/
µ¿¿ä ¹× ¹Î¿ä ¸ðÀ½
/
À½¾ÇÀÇ ¿ª»ç¿Í ÀÌ·Ð
/
¹æ¸í·Ï ¹× °Ô½ÃÆÇ
/
»çÀÌÆ® ¸Ê
¹æ¸í·Ï ¹× °Ô½ÃÆÇ
>>
ÇǾƳ뿬ÁÖ µ¿¿µ»ó1
>>
Oh, I totally agree ( Jehangir * )
|
Oh, I totally agree that what you’re pointing out would be an issue. I don’t think that you’d ever reach 100% enforcement, but do think that *some* images would be caught. I see the issue of signature updates (perhaps incorrectly) as a technical issue that could be overcome if there was dedicated technical competence with some funding behind it.While some pedophiles who were smart would likely just resize images, I don’t imagine that authorities would have an issue chasing after the low hanging fruit using a DPailIc-fitated method, and more traditional approaches for more intelligent pedophiles.
|
|