musicavant / ¼Ò°³ ¹× »ç¿ë¾È³» / ¿¬½À½Ç / °íÀüÀ½¾Ç ¹× ±¹¾Ç ¸ðÀ½ / ´ëÁßÀ½¾Ç ¹× µ¿½Ã´ëÀ½¾Ç ¸ðÀ½ / µ¿¿ä ¹× ¹Î¿ä ¸ðÀ½ / À½¾ÇÀÇ ¿ª»ç¿Í ÀÌ·Ð / ¹æ¸í·Ï ¹× °Ô½ÃÆÇ / »çÀÌÆ® ¸Ê

¹æ¸í·Ï ¹× °Ô½ÃÆÇ >> ÇǾƳ뿬ÁÖ µ¿¿µ»ó1 >> Oh, I totally agree   ( Jehangir * )

Oh, I totally agree that what you’re pointing out would be an issue. I don’t think that you’d ever reach 100% enforcement, but do think that *some* images would be caught. I see the issue of signature updates (perhaps incorrectly) as a technical issue that could be overcome if there was dedicated technical competence with some funding behind it.While some pedophiles who were smart would likely just resize images, I don’t imagine that authorities would have an issue chasing after the low hanging fruit using a DPailIc-fitated method, and more traditional approaches for more intelligent pedophiles.